Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Headwater Research LLC v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00422 (E.D. Tex. May 6, 2024)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00422, Dkt. No. 217
Decided
May 6, 2024
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 196 OPPOSED SEALED MOTION Strike Amended Expert Reports of Dr. Andreas Groehn and Mr. David Kennedy filed by SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 204 OPPOSED MOTION for Leave to File Addition…
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Samsung’s Motion to Strike Amended Expert Reports of Dr. Andreas Groehn and Mr. David Kennedy. (Dkt. No. 196) The Court DENIES the Motion as provided below. I. BACKGROUND The parties exchanged opening expert reports including for Dr. Groehn and Mr. Kennedy on March 29, 2024. (Mot. at 2.) Dr. Groehn provided a report on a survey he performed to “measure the economic value of increased battery life in mobile phones.” ( Id.) Mr. Kennedy then applied this information to prepare a reasonable royalty calculation.