Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Headwater Research LLC v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00422 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 7, 2024)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00422, Dkt. No. 433
Decided
November 7, 2024
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 253 SEALED MOTION PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO EXCLUDE OR STRIKE CERTAIN REBUTTAL EXPERT OPINIONS OF PHILIP W. KLINE filed by HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC. (Motion(s)253 terminated)
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Headwater’s Motion to exclude or Strike Certain Rebuttal Expert Opinions of Philip W. Kline (Dkt. No. 253). For the reasons provided below, the Motion is DENIED. I. APPLICABLE LAW An expert witness may provide opinion testimony if “(a) the expert’s scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue; (b) the testimony is based on sufficient facts or data; (c) the testimony is the product of reliable principl…