Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Headwater Research LLC v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00422 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 7, 2024)

Granted in Part
Daubert / Expert Challenges Damages
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00422, Dkt. No. 434
Decided
November 7, 2024
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 251 SEALED MOTION DAUBERT MOTION AND MOTION TO STRIKE EXPERT TESTIMONY OF DR. ANDREAS GROEHN filed by SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 252 SEALED MOTION Daubert Motion and Motion to Strik…
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Samsung’s Daubert Motion and Motion to Strike Expert testimony of Dr. Andreas Groehn (Dkt. No. 251) and Daubert Motion and Motion to Strike Expert Testimony of Mr. David Kennedy. (Dkt. No. 252). I. BACKGROUND In proving its damages case, Headwater uses three experts, Dr. Wesel, Dr. Groehn, and Mr. Kennedy. Dr. Wesel performed an infringement analysis of Samsung’s devices and analyzed the impact of the allegedly infringing instrumentalities on battery life. Dr.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case