Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Arigna Technology Limited v. Nissan Motor Company, Ltd. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00126 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 24, 2022)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00126, Dkt. No. 322
Decided
October 24, 2022
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 148 SEALED MOTION to Exclude Opinions of Gary Gutzler Relating to Technical Apportionment filed by Arigna Technology Limited
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion t o Exclude Motion to Exclude Opinions of Gary Gutzler Relating to Technical Apportionment filed by Plaintiff Arigna Technology Limited. Dkt. No. 148. For the following reasons, the motion is DENIED. I. Background Arigna filed suit against vehicle part supplier Continental 1 and several of its vehicle manufacturer customers2 alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,397,318 (“’318 Patent”) directed to a voltage-controlled oscillator for use in a microchip. Case No. 2:22-cv-00054 Dkt. No.