Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Arigna Technology Limited v. Nissan Motor Company, Ltd. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00126 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 24, 2022)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00126, Dkt. No. 321
Decided
October 24, 2022
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court defendants1 move to exclude potions of plaintiff Arigna Technologies, Ltd.’s damages expert report, provided by David E. Yurkerwich. Dkt. Nos. 162, 252. For the following reasons, the motions are DENIED. I. Background and Procedural Posture On February 18, 2021, Arigna filed suit against various vehicle manufacturers alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,397,318 (“’318 Patent”) directed to a voltage -controlled oscillator (“VCO”).