Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Arigna Technology Limited v. Nissan Motor Company, Ltd. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00126 (E.D. Tex. July 29, 2022)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00126, Dkt. No. 133
Decided
July 29, 2022
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 58 SEALED MOTION to Compel filed by Arigna Technology Limited
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On July 19, 2022, the Court heard arguments concerning two issues related to discovery: (1) whether Defendants ADC Automotive Distance Control Systems GmbH, Conti Temic microelectronic GmbH, Continental AG (collectively, “Continental”) complied with the Court’s June 10 Order ( the “Order”) (Dkt. No. 49) and (2) whether to compel Continental to produce certain information requested by Plaintiff Arigna Technology Limited in Arigna’s Motion to Compel (Dkt. No. 58). I.