Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Arigna Technology Limited v. Nissan Motor Company, Ltd. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00126 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 24, 2022)

Denied
Daubert / Expert Challenges Infringement
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00126, Dkt. No. 318
Decided
October 24, 2022
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 160 Opposed SEALED MOTION Defendants Motion to Exclude the Opinion of Dr. Carl Sechen filed by Continental AG, Tesla, Inc., Toyota Motor Corporation, ADC Automotive Distance Control Systems GmbH, General Motors LLC, Cont…
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court defendants 1 move to exclude portions of plaintiff Arigna Technologies Ltd.’s technical expert Dr. Carl Sechen’s report. Dkt. No. 160. For the following reasons, the motion is DENIED. I. Background On February 18, 2021, Arigna filed suit against various vehicle manufacturers alleging infringement of independent claims 1 and 2 of U.S. Patent No. 7,397,318 (“’318 Patent”) directed to a voltage -controlled oscillator incorporated into radar modules provided by vehicle parts manufacturer Continental. Case ‘54 Dkt. No. 1; see also id.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case