Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Firtiva Corporation v. Funimation Global Group, LLC, No. 2:21-cv-00111 (E.D. Tex. June 1, 2022)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00111, Dkt. No. 162
Decided
June 1, 2022
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 142 SEALED MOTION to Strike Portions of Supplemental Expert Report of Dr. Jeffrey A. Stec
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Strike Portions of Supplemental Expert Report of Dr. Jeffrey A. Stec filed by Defendant Funimation Global Group, LLC. Dkt. No. 142. Having considered the briefing, the Court DENIES the Motion. I. BACKGROUND On March 31, 2021, Plaintiff Firtiva Corporation filed the present suit against Defendant Funimation Global Group, LLC. Dkt. No. 1. Firtiva alleges that Funimation’s advertising video - on-demand (“A VOD”) service infringes certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 10,116,999 (the “’999 Patent”).