Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Firtiva Corporation v. Funimation Global Group, LLC, No. 2:21-cv-00111 (E.D. Tex. May 24, 2022)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00111, Dkt. No. 151
Decided
May 24, 2022
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER - granting in part 87 Motion to Strike Portions of the Expert Reports
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Omnibus Motion to Strike Portions of the Expert Reports of Benjamin F. Goldberg and Dana M. Trexler filed by Plaintiff Firtiva Corporation. Dkt. No. 87. Having considered the briefing, the Court GRANTS IN PART the motion. I. BACKGROUND On March 31, 2021, Firtiva filed the present suit against Defendant Funimation Global Group, LLC. Dkt. No. 1. Firtiva alleges that Funimation’s advertising video -on-demand (“A VOD”) infringes certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 10,116,999 (the “’999 Patent”).