Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Firtiva Corporation v. Funimation Global Group, LLC, No. 2:21-cv-00111 (E.D. Tex. June 1, 2022)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00111, Dkt. No. 161
Decided
June 1, 2022
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER - granting 89 SEALED PATENT MOTION to Strike Defendant's Amended Invalidity Contentions and Benjamin Goldberg PhD's Expert Opinions
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Strike Defendant’s Amended Invalidity Contentions and Benjamin F. Goldberg, Ph.D’s Expert Opinions Relating to Akadiri ’626, filed by Plaintiff Firtiva Corporation. Dkt. No. 89. Having considered the briefing, the Motion is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND On March 31, 2021, Firtiva filed the present suit against Defendant Funimation Global Group, LLC. Dkt. No. 1. Firtiva alleges that Funimation’s advertising video -on-demand (“A VOD”) systems infringe certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 10,116,999 (the “’999 Patent”).