Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Firtiva Corporation v. Funimation Global Group, LLC, No. 2:21-cv-00111 (E.D. Tex. May 25, 2022)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00111, Dkt. No. 156
Decided
May 25, 2022
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion for Clarification of the Court’s Claim Construction of “Receiving an Enticement ” and “Transmitting the Enticement” filed by Defendant Funimation Global Group, LLC. Dkt. No. 123. Having considered the briefing, the Court DENIES the motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Firtiva Corporation alleges Funimation infringes certain claims of U.S. Patent 10,116,999 (the “’999 Patent”) . The ’999 Patent concerns systems and methods for allowing content to be broadcast without commercial interruption. ’999 Patent at 57.