Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

United Services Automobile Association v. PNC Bank N.A., No. 2:20-cv-00319 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 29, 2022)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:20-cv-00319, Dkt. No. 621
Decided
April 29, 2022
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 318 SEALED PATENT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF LACK OF ENABLEMENT UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 112(1) filed by PNC Bank N.A
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Moti on for Summary Judgment of Lack of Enablement Under 35 U.S.C. § 112(1) filed by Defendant PNC Bank N.A. (Dkt. No. 318). For the reasons that follow, the motion should be DENIED. Plaintiff United Services Automobile Association (“USAA”) alleges that PNC infringes six patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 10,482,432 (“’432 Patent”), 10,621,559 (“’559 Patent”), 10,013,681 (“’681 Patent”), 10,013,605 (“’605 Patent”), 8,977,571 (“’571 Patent”), and 8,699,779 (“’779 Patent”) (the “Asserted Patents”) .