Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

United Services Automobile Association v. PNC Bank N.A., No. 2:20-cv-00319 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 20, 2022)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:20-cv-00319, Dkt. No. 596
Decided
April 20, 2022
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 325 SEALED PATENT MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT OPINIONS OF DR. CHARLES CREUSERE REGARDING CONCEPTION DATES filed by PNC Bank N.A
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion To Exclude Expert Opinions Of Dr. Charles Creusere Regarding Conception Dates filed by Defendant PNC Bank N.A. (“PNC”). Dkt. No. 325. Having considered the briefing, the Court DENEIS the motion. I. BACKGROUND In this case, Plaintiff United Services Automobile Association (“USAA”) alleges that PNC infringes six patents: U.S. Patent Nos .