Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

United Services Automobile Association v. PNC Bank N.A., No. 2:20-cv-00319 (E.D. Tex. May 3, 2022)

See Opinion Disposition stated in the opinion
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:20-cv-00319, Dkt. No. 636
Decided
May 3, 2022
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND ORDER re 323 SEALED PATENT MOTION for Summary Judgment Dismissing PNC's Patent-Eligibility Defenses filed by United Services Automobile Association
Length
16 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are three motions all related to 35 U.S.C. § 101: • Motion for Summary Judgment Dismissing PNC's Patent-Eligibility Defenses filed by Plaintiff United Services Automobile Association (“USAA”), Dkt. No. 323; • Motion For Summary Judgment Of Lack Of Patent Eligibility Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 filed by Defendant PNC Bank N.A. (“PNC”), Dkt. No. 322; and • Motion to Strike Portions of the Opening Expert Report of Mark Webster, Dkt. No. 310. Having reviewed the briefing, it is recommended that USAA’s Motion for Summary Judgment be GRANTED. (Dkt.