Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

GREE, Inc. v. Supercell Oy, No. 2:19-cv-00310 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 26, 2021)

Granted in Part
Discovery Contentions
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00310, Dkt. No. 253
Decided
April 26, 2021
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 165 Opposed SEALED MOTION Defendant Supercell Oys Opposed Motion for Leave to Supplement its Non-Infringement Expert Report filed by SUPERCELL OY
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are two motions filed by Defendant Supercell Oy. The first is Supercell’s Opposed Motion for Leave to Supplement its Non-Infringement Expert Report (“Motion re Non- Infringement”).1 The second is Supercell’s Opposed Motion for Leave to Amend Invalidity Contentions and Expert Reports (“Motion re Invalidity”).2 I.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case