Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

GREE, Inc. v. Supercell Oy, No. 2:19-cv-00310 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 11, 2021)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00310, Dkt. No. 188
Decided
February 11, 2021
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 117 SEALED MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF GREE, INC.S DAMAGES EXPERT, STEPHEN BECKER filed by SUPERCELL OY
Length
15 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are motions in all of the above -captioned cases 1 entitled Defendant Supercell Oy’s Motion to Exclude the Testimony of GRE E, Inc.’s Damages Expert, Stephen Becker (the “Motions”) filed by Defendant Supercell Oy (“Supercell”). Dkt. No. 154 in Case No. 2:19-cv-200-JRG-RSP (“the -200 case”), Dkt. No. 140 in Case No. 2:19-cv-237-JRG-RSP (“the - 237 case”), Dkt. No. 117 in Case No. 2:19-cv-310-JRG-RSP (“the -310 case”), and Dkt. No. 123 in Case No. 2:19- cv-311-JRG-RSP.