Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

GREE, Inc. v. Supercell Oy, No. 2:19-cv-00310 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 23, 2021)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00310, Dkt. No. 179
Decided
January 23, 2021
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 115 SEALED MOTION Defendant Supercell Oys Motion to Strike Gree, Inc.s Technical Expert, Dr. Robert Akl, for Improper Claim Construction filed by SUPERCELL OY
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Supercell Oy’s Motion to Strike Plaintiff GREE, Inc.’s Technical Expert, Dr. Robert Akl , for Improper Claim Construction. Dkt. No. 115. Supercell’s Motion seeks to strike opinions of Dr. Akl that allegedly rely upon an improper claim construction of “character.” I. BACKGROUND On October 13, 2020, the Court issued a Claim Construction Order construing disputed claim terms of U.S. Patent No. 10,076,708 (the “’708 patent”) and No. 10,413,832 (the “’832 patent”). Dkt. No. 84.