Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

GREE, Inc. v. Supercell Oy, No. 2:19-cv-00310 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 17, 2020)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00310, Dkt. No. 127
Decided
December 17, 2020
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 88 Opposed SEALED PATENT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS UNDER P.R. 3-6 filed by GREE, INC
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff GREE, Inc.’s Motion for Leave to Amend Infringement Contentions Under P.R. 3-6. Dkt. No. 88. GREE’s Motion seeks leave to amend the infringement contentions to accuse Clan Wars 2, a Clash Royale feature launched on August 31, 2020. Id. at 4. I. BACKGROUND On January 28, 2020, GREE served its initial infringement contentions accusing Supercell’s Clash Royale and other games of infringing the asserted patents. Dkt. No. 88- 1 at 1. On August 3, 2020, GREE served its amended infringement contentions. Id. at 1–2.