Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 2:18-cv-00366 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 17, 2019)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:18-cv-00366, Dkt. No. 178
Decided
December 17, 2019
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 85 SEALED MOTION Refile Motion to Strike And/Or Exclude The Expert Testimony of Roy Weinstein filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Plaintiff United Services Automobile Association filed suit against Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., alleging patent infringement. To help prove its case, USAA hired Mr. Roy Weinstein as its damages expert. Wells Fargo now brings a M otion to Strike and/or Exclude the Expert Testimony of Roy Weinstein. (Dkt. No. 85.) 1 USAA specifically requests that Mr. Weinstein be prohibited from referencing: (1) his “specialized equipment analysis,” (2) Wells Fargo’s previous Covered Business Method petitions, and (3) Mr. Calman’s expert report.