Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 2:18-cv-00366 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 17, 2019)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:18-cv-00366, Dkt. No. 176
Decided
December 17, 2019
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 83 SEALED MOTION Refile Motion to Exclude And/Or Strike Expert Testimony Provided by Mr. Calman filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 84 Wells Fargos Motion to Strike Conte
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) filed a Motion to Exclude and/or Strike Expert Testimony Provided by Mr. Calman (the “Motion to Strike Calman”), which is now before the Court. (Dkt. No. 83.) After consideration, the Motion to Strike Calman is GRANTED- IN-PART. The Motion to Strike Calman is GRANTED as to paragraphs 54–73, 85–133, and 322–329, and those portions of Mr. Calman’s report are STRICKEN. The Motion to Strike Calman is otherwise DENIED.