Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 2:18-cv-00366 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 18, 2019)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:18-cv-00366, Dkt. No. 177
Decided
December 18, 2019
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 80 SEALED MOTION to Strike Portions of the Expert Report of William Saffici filed by United Services Automobile Association
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Plaintiff United Services Automobile Association filed suit against Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., alleging patent infringement. Wells Fargo raised a series of defenses, including invalidity of USAA’s asserted patents. (Dkt. No. 36) . To support its invalidity defense, Wells Fargo retained Mr. William Saffici as an expert, who wrote a report presenting obviousness opinions based on various combinations of references. (Dkt. No. 90- 3). USAA now brings a Daubert Motion to Strike Portions of the Expert Report of William Saffici. (Dkt. No.