CXT Systems, Inc. v. Academy, Ltd., d/b/a Academy Sports + Outdoors, No. 2:18-cv-00171 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 28, 2020)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Before the Court is the Motion to Exclude the Expert Testimony of CXT Systems , Inc.’s Damages Expert David A. Haas (the “Motion”), filed by Defendant J. C. Penney Company, Inc. (“JCP”). (Dkt. No. 283 ). In the Motion, JCP argues that th e Court should strike Mr. Haas’ testimony in its entirety because it depends on unreliable sources of information and methods to calculate the proposed royalty rate. Having considered the briefing on the Motion and Mr. Haas’ report, the Court DENIES the Motion. I.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error