Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

CXT Systems, Inc. v. Academy, Ltd., d/b/a Academy Sports + Outdoors, No. 2:18-cv-00171 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 28, 2020)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:18-cv-00171, Dkt. No. 425
Decided
January 28, 2020
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
14 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.’s (“JCP”) Motion to Exclude the Expert Testimony of Plaintiff CXT Systems, Inc.’s (“CXT”) Technical Expert Joseph C. McAlexander III (“Motion”). Dkt. No. 282.1 Within this Motion, JCP asserts that McAlexander’s opinions should be excluded in whole or in part because (1) McAlexander failed to sufficiently disclose opinions that the JCP Checkout infringed standing alone ; (2) the methods underlying McAlexander’s opinions on infringement by the ATG implementa…