Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

CXT Systems, Inc. v. Academy, Ltd., d/b/a Academy Sports + Outdoors, No. 2:18-cv-00171 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 23, 2019)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:18-cv-00171, Dkt. No. 145
Decided
April 23, 2019
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 124 Report and Recommendations 58 Motion to Dismiss filed by J. C. Penney Corporation, Inc
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Now before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 124) by Magistrate Judge Payne, which denies Defendant J.C. Penney Company, Inc.’s first motion to dismiss (Dkt No. 58) as moot in light of Plaintiff CXT Systems, Inc.’s First Amended Complaint, and recommends that J.C. Penney’s second motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 73) be denied. In its second motion to dismiss, J.C.