Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

CXT Systems, Inc. v. Academy, Ltd., d/b/a Academy Sports + Outdoors, No. 2:18-cv-00171 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 6, 2019)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:18-cv-00171, Dkt. No. 207
Decided
September 6, 2019
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
67 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the opening claim constructi on brief of CXT Systems, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) (Dkt. No. 181, filed on June 12, 2019), 1 the response of Academy Ltd., Fossil Group, Inc., Specialty Retailers, Inc., Tailored Brands, Inc., Conn’s, Inc., J. C. Penney Corporation, Inc., Pier 1 Imports (U.S.), Inc., and Pier 1 Services Co mpany (collectively “Defendants”) (Dkt. No. 188, filed on July 3, 2019),2 and Plaintiff’s reply (Dkt. No. 189, filed on July 11, 2019).