Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Plastronics Socket Partners, Ltd. et al v Dong Weon Hwang et al, No. 2:18-cv-00014 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 20, 2020)

Granted in Part
JMOL / Post-Trial Attorneys' Fees Damages
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:18-cv-00014, Dkt. No. 395
Decided
March 20, 2020
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER re 350 SEALED MOTION HiCon Co., Ltd. and HiCon's Motion for Attorneys' Fees Under 35 USC 285 filed by HiCon Company, HiCon Co., Ltd., 356 MOTION for Bill of Costs filed by Plastronics Socket Partners, Ltd., Plastr…
Length
24 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are (1) Defendant Dong Weon Hwang’s Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (Dkt. No. 349) ; (2) Pla intiffs Plastronics Socket Partners, Ltd. (“Plastronics Socket”) and Plastronics H-Pin Ltd.’s (“Plastronics H-Pin”) (collectively, “Plastronics”) Renewed Motion for JMOL on Defendants’ Royalty Counterclaim or Alternatively, Motion for New Trial (Subject to Remittitur) (Dkt. No. 353); and (3) Plastronics’ Verified Motion to Amend Judgement or for New Trial (Dkt. No. 351).

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case