Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Plastronics Socket Partners, Ltd. et al v Dong Weon Hwang et al, No. 2:18-cv-00014 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 1, 2019)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:18-cv-00014, Dkt. No. 183
Decided
March 1, 2019
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 168 Report and Recommendations, 92 Motion to Dismiss, filed by Plastronics Socket Partners, Ltd., Plastronics H-Pin, Ltd
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Report and Recomme ndation of Magistrate Judge Payne dated February 13, 2019 (Dkt. No. 168) which recommends that Plastronics’ Motion to Dismiss Hwang and HiCon Co., Ltd's Counterclaims for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief can be Granted Under Rule 12(b)(6) (Dkt. No. 92) be granted in part. No objections having been filed and for the reasons set forth in the Court’s Re port and Recommendation, the Recommendation is ADOPTED.