Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Plastronics Socket Partners, Ltd. et al v Dong Weon Hwang et al, No. 2:18-cv-00014 (E.D. Tex. May 20, 2019)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:18-cv-00014, Dkt. No. 264
Decided
May 20, 2019
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 205 SEALED MOTION TO STRIKE EXPERT REPORTS OF JAMES WOODS, PHD AND PRECLUDE TESTIMONY filed by Plastronics Socket Partners, Ltd., Plastronics H-Pin, Ltd
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Plaintiffs Plastronics Socket Partners, Ltd. (“Plastronics Socket”) and Plastronics H-Pin, Ltd. (“Plastronics H-Pin”) (collectively, “Plastronics”) filed an Opposed Motion to Strike Expert Reports of James Woods, which is now before the Court. (Dkt. No. 205.) This Motion seeks to strike portions of Woods’ reports and exclude testimony regarding: (1) non-infringing substitutes and the relevant market under Panduit factor two; (2) manufacturing and marketing capacity under Panduit factor three; (3) the economic impac…