Plastronics Socket Partners, Ltd. et al v Dong Weon Hwang et al, No. 2:18-cv-00014 (E.D. Tex. July 3, 2019)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are (1) Defendants’ Objection (Dkt. No. 247) to the Order (Dkt. No. 223); (2) the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 280), which wa s not objected to; (3) Defendants’ Objections (Dkt. No. 297) to the Repo rt and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 281); (4) Defendants’ Objection (Dkt. No. 301) to the Magistrate Judge’s Order (Dkt. No. 282); (5) Plaintiffs’ Objection (Dkt. No. 308) to the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 287); and (6) Defendants’ Objection (Dkt. No. 307) to Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 300).