Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Salazar v. HTC Corporation, No. 2:16-cv-01096 (E.D. Tex. May 1, 2018)

Denied
Marking (§ 287) Summary Judgment
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-01096, Dkt. No. 249
Decided
May 1, 2018
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 238 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment On Compliance With Marking Requirements Under 35 U.S.C. § 287(a) filed by Joe Andrew Salazar
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

1 / 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION JOE ANDREW SALAZAR, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § No. 2:16-CV-01096-JRG- RSP § HTC CORPORATION, § § Defendant. § MEMORANDUM OPINION In this patent case, the Court now considers Plaintiff Joe Salazar’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Compliance With Ma rking Requirements [Dkt. # 238].

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case