Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Salazar v. HTC Corporation, No. 2:16-cv-01096 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 13, 2018)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-01096, Dkt. No. 226
Decided
April 13, 2018
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re 159 MOTION Daubert Motion to Exclude the Opinions and Testimony of Plaintiff's Damages Expert, Justin Blok filed by HTC Corporation
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

1 / 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION JOE ANDREW SALAZAR, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § No. 2:16-CV-01096-JRG-RSP § HTC CORPORATION, § § Defendants. § MEMORANDUM OPINION In this patent case, Defendant HTC Corporation moves to exclude certain testimony of Justin Blok, Plaintiff’s damages expert, based on his purported failures to apportion the value of the patented aspects of the accused instrumentalities and support certain underlying premises of his report.