Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Salazar v. HTC Corporation, No. 2:16-cv-01096 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 20, 2017)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-01096, Dkt. No. 80
Decided
August 20, 2017
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re 55 MOTION to Sever and Stay Claims Against Newly-Added Defendant AT&T, Inc. filed by HTC Corporation, 78 Emergency MOTION to Stay Claims Against AT&T Inc. Pending Resolution of HTC Corp. and AT&T Inc.'s Motion to Sev…
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

In this patent case, the Court now cons iders HTC’s and AT&T’s Motion to Sever and Stay Claims Against Newly-Added Defendant AT&T, Inc. [Dkt. # 55].1 Notice [Dkt. # 70].For the following reasons, the Court will GRANT the motion. I. BACKGROUND Joe Salazar sued HTC Corpor ation in October 2016 alle ging infringement of U.S. Patent 5,802,467. Compl. [Dkt. # 1]. The ’467 Patent is generally directed to a system for sound and data transmission and reception. ’467 Patent [54].