Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Salazar v. HTC Corporation, No. 2:16-cv-01096 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 27, 2018)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-01096, Dkt. No. 247
Decided
April 27, 2018
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
ne on 4/27/2018. (nkl, )MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 157 MOTION Daubert Motion to Exclude Portions of the Expert Report and Testimony of Plaintiff's Validity Expert Oded Gottesman filed by HTC Corporation
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Defendant HTC Corporation moves to exclude certain testimony of Oded Gottesman, Plaintiff’s invalidity expert, based on his purportedly incorrect application of law. HTC’s Motion to Exclude [Dkt. # 157]. Specifically, HTC contends Gottesman’s opinions concerning three claim terms should be excluded based on his improper analysis. The Court will GRANT the motion IN PART. 1.