Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Intellectual Ventures II LLC v. FedEx Corporation et al, No. 2:16-cv-00980 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 22, 2017)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00980, Dkt. No. 206
Decided
December 22, 2017
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 162 MOTION For Entry Of Model Order Focusing Patent Claims And Prior Art To Reduce Costs, And Temporary Stay Of Proceedings Pending Plaintiff's Election Of Claims filed by FedEx Custom Critical, Inc., FedEx F…
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Entry of a Model Order Focusing Patent Claims and Prior Art to Reduce Costs, and Temporary Stay of Proceedings Pending Plaintiff’s Election of Claims (Dkt. No. 162) (“the Motion”). Having consi dered the same, the Court finds that said Motion should be and hereby is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. I. Background Plaintiff filed this case on August 31, 2016 , alleging patent infringement against FedEx Corporation (“FedEx Corp.”), Federal Express Corporation (“FedEx Express”), FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.