Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Intellectual Ventures II LLC v. FedEx Corporation et al, No. 2:16-cv-00980 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 1, 2017)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00980, Dkt. No. 167
Decided
December 1, 2017
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 150 Opposed MOTION re 137 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to U.S. Patent 8,494,581 - Rule 12(c), 139 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to U.S. Patent 6,909,356 - Rule 12(c), 140 MOTION for Judgm…
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Intellectual Ventures II LLC ’s ( “Plaintiff” or “Intellectual Ventures”) Motion to Treat FedEx’s Rule 12(c) Motions as Summary Judgment Motions and Deny Them as Exceeding the Page Limits, or in the Alternative to Ex tend Intellectual Ventures’ Time to Respond (Dkt. No. 150) ( “the Motion”). Having reviewed the Parties ’ Arguments, the Court GRANTS the Motion to the extent Plaintiff seeks an extension and CARRIES the Motion as to converting Defendants’ Motions under 12(c) into motions under Rule 56. I.