Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Intellectual Ventures II LLC v. FedEx Corporation et al, No. 2:16-cv-00980 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 22, 2017)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00980, Dkt. No. 161
Decided
November 22, 2017
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 84 MOTION to Dismiss under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) filed by FedEx Custom Critical, Inc., FedEx Freight, Inc., Federal Express Corporation, FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., FedEx Office and Print Services, Inc.,…
Length
20 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

According to the FedEx Defendants’ advertising, they are “everywhere” you need them to be. However, in their Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 84) (“the Motion”) Defendants argue that they are everywhere but this District, at least with respect to venue. The Court disagrees. Accordingly, and for the reasons set forth herein, Defendants’ Motion is DENIED. I.