Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Alacritech Inc. v. CenturyLink, Inc., No. 2:16-cv-00693 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 22, 2017)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00693, Dkt. No. 364
Decided
September 22, 2017
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Denying without prejudice 339
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

In this patent case, Intervenors Intel and Cavium move the Court to stay this action pending inter partes review (IPR) of the asserted patents. Intervenors’ Motion [Dkt. # 339]. The Court DENIES the motion WITHOUT PREJUDICE. I. BACKGROUND In June 2016, Alacritech filed complaints against the defendants in three actions, asserting U.S. Patents 7,124,205, 7,237,036, 7,337,241, 7,673,072, 8,805,948, 7,945,699, 8,131,880, and 9,055,104 (the Asserted Patents). The Court consolidated all three actions for pre-trial purposes.