Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Alacritech Inc. v. CenturyLink, Inc., No. 2:16-cv-00693 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 22, 2017)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00693, Dkt. No. 363
Decided
September 22, 2017
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING 340 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and 44 Motion by CenturyLink is DENIED
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

ADOPTING The Court referred the above-entitled and numbered civil action to United States Mag istrate Judge Roy S. Payne pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Now before the Court is Judge Payne’s Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 340), which recommends the Court deny Tier 3, Inc.’s, Savvis Communications Corp.’s, and CenturyLink Communications, LLC’s (together, “CenturyLink”) Motion to Dismiss Alacritech’s Indirect Infringement Claims Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (Docket No. 44).