Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Alacritech Inc. v. CenturyLink, Inc., No. 2:16-cv-00693 (E.D. Tex. July 14, 2017)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00693, Dkt. No. 306
Decided
July 14, 2017
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - granting in part 259 Motion to Strike a Portion ofAlacritechs Patent Rule 3-1 Infringement Contentions
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

In this patent case, the Court will now consider Intel’s Motion to Strike a Portion of Alacritech’s Patent Rule 3-1 Infringement Contentions [Dkt. # 259]. After considering the parties’ briefing and arguments of counsel, the Court will GRANT the motion IN PART. I. BACKGROUND The technology at issue concerns transfer ring and storing data within a network. Compl. ¶ 16. According to Al acritech, traditional methodol ogies wasted too much pro- cessing power performing brute-force pr ocesses for transfer and storage. Id.