Emed Technologies Corporation et al v Repro-Med Systems, Inc., No. 2:15-cv-01167 (E.D. Tex. June 28, 2019)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. In this action, Defendant Repro-Med Systems, Inc. (“Repro-Med”) moved for summary judgment as to non-infringement, arguing that there is no evidence that the Accused Products contain each limitation of claim 9 either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents. (Dkt No. 121). Magistrate Judge Payne recommended that Repro-Med’s summary judgment motion be granted in all r espects. (Dkt. No. 166).