Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Emed Technologies Corporation et al v Repro-Med Systems, Inc., No. 2:15-cv-01167 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 4, 2019)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-01167, Dkt. No. 109
Decided
March 4, 2019
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
19 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On February 20, 2019, the Court held a hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms in United States Patent No. 8,961,476 (“the ’476 Patent”). Having considered the arguments made by the parties at the hearing and in the parties’ claim construction briefing (Dkt. Nos. 98, 101, and 102), having consid ered the intrinsic evidence, and having made subsidiary factual findings a bout the extrinsic evidence, the Court hereby issues this Claim Construction Memorandum and Order. See Phillips v. AWH Corp. , 415 F.3d 1303, 1314 (Fed.