Emed Technologies Corporation et al v Repro-Med Systems, Inc., No. 2:15-cv-01167 (E.D. Tex. May 12, 2016)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant’s 1 Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review. (Dkt. No. 45; “Motion to Stay”). Plaintiff2 opposes the Motion to Stay. (Dkt. No. 52). I. LAW A district court has the inherent power to control its own doc ket, including the power to stay proceedings before it. See Clinton v. Jones , 520 U.S. 681, 706 (1997) (“The District Court has broad discretion to stay proceedings as an incident to its power to control its own docket.”).