Emed Technologies Corporation et al v Repro-Med Systems, Inc., No. 2:15-cv-01167 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 7, 2018)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Now before the Court is the Report & Recommendation (Dkt. No. 80) by Magistrate Judge Payne, which recommends that Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 66) be denied and Plaintiff’s motion to amend its infringement contentions (Dkt. No. 67) be granted. No party has objected to the Report & Recommendation. Having reviewed Magistrate Judge Payne’s report, Defendant’s motion, Plaintiff’s response (Dkt. No.