Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

ZiiLabs Inc., Ltd v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al, No. 2:14-cv-00203 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 9, 2015)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00203, Dkt. No. 532
Decided
December 9, 2015
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
***FILED ERROR. DULPICATE TO # 526***MEMORANDUM ORDER
Length
13 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff ZiiLabs’ Opposed Motion to Strike Portions of the Expert Reports of Dr. John Kelly and Dr. Keith Ugone. (D kt. No. 303.) Dr. Kelly is Defendant Samsung’s non-infringement expert on U.S. Patent No. 6,111,584 (the ’584 patent). 1 Dr. Ugone is Samsung’s damages expert. Plaintiff asserts the Court should exclude: (1) Dr. Kelly’s testimony on claim construction; (2) Dr. Kelly’s testimony on apportionment; (3) Dr. Ugone’s testimony on apportionment; and (4) Dr. Ugone’s testimony on the effective royalty rate. (Dkt. No.