Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

ZiiLabs Inc., Ltd v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al, No. 2:14-cv-00203 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 2, 2015)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00203, Dkt. No. 459
Decided
November 2, 2015
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff ZiiLabs’ Opposed Motion to Strike Defendants Apple’s and Samsung’s Expert Opinions Concerning Undisc losed Non-Infringing Alternatives.1 (Dkt. No. 288.) ZiiLabs and Apple have settled. Therefore, the remaining issue in this Motion is whether the Court should strike parts of the Rebuttal Expert Report by Samsung’s expert Dr. Anselmo A. Lastra (the Lastra Report ).