ZiiLabs Inc., Ltd v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al, No. 2:14-cv-00203 (E.D. Tex. June 29, 2015)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On March 24, 2015, the Court held a hearing to determine th e proper construction of the disputed claim terms in United States Patent Nos. 5,831,637 (“the ‘637 Patent”); 5,835,096 (“the ‘096 Patent”); 6,111,584 (“the ‘584 Patent ”); 6,683,615 (“the ‘615 Pa tent”); 6,977,649 (“the ‘649 Patent”); 7,050,061 (“the ‘061 Patent ”); 7,187,383 (“the ‘383 Pa tent”); 7,710,425 (“the ‘425 Patent”); and 8,144,156 (“the ‘ 156 Patent”) (collectively, the “Asserted Patents”).