Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

ZiiLabs Inc., Ltd v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al, No. 2:14-cv-00203 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 8, 2015)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00203, Dkt. No. 524
Decided
December 8, 2015
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Defendant Samsung’s Motion to Strike Evidence Submitted in Support of Plaintiff ZiiLabs’ Opposition to Samsung’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of N o Willful Infringement. 1 (Dkt. No. 365.) First, Samsung asserts that relevant pre- suit communications between Samsung and Plaintiff are not admissible under two non-disclosure agreements.