Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

ContentGuard Holdings, Inc. v. Google, Inc., No. 2:14-cv-00061 (E.D. Tex. July 8, 2016)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00061, Dkt. No. 486
Decided
July 8, 2016
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
15 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are the following motions filed by Plaintiff ContentGuard Holdings, Inc. (“ContentGuard”) and Defendants Google, Inc., HTC America, Inc., HTC Corporation, Huawei Device USA, Inc., Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Motorola Mobility LLC, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung TeleCommuni cations America, LLC (collectively, “Defendants”): (1) ContentGuard’s Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law with Respect to the Google-Samsung Trial or, in the Altern ative, for a New Trial (Dkt. No. 400 1; Dkt. No. 1038 in Case No.