Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

ContentGuard Holdings, Inc. v. Google, Inc., No. 2:14-cv-00061 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 30, 2015)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00061, Dkt. No. 158
Decided
March 30, 2015
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Google Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (Dkt. N o. 35.) The Court held a hearing on the initial motion on November 18, 2014. APPLICABLE LAW The Federal Circuit “review[s] a district c ourt’s dismissal for failure to state a claim under the law of the regional circuit. Content Extraction & Transmission LLC v. Wells Fargo Bank, Nat. Ass'n, 776 F.3d 1343, 13 46 (Fed. Cir. 2014) (citing In re Bill of Lading Transmission & Processing Sys.