Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

ContentGuard Holdings, Inc. v. Google, Inc., No. 2:14-cv-00061 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 6, 2015)

Denied
§ 101 Eligibility Summary Judgment Motion to Dismiss
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00061, Dkt. No. 299
Decided
August 6, 2015
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re Joint Renewed Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Declaring All Asserted Patent Claims Invalid Pursuant to 35 U.S.C.§ 101
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Joint Renewed Motio n for Judgment on the Pleadings Declaring All Asserted Patent Claims Invalid Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 101 (Dkt. No. 539) (“Motion”) filed by Defendants Motorola Mobility, LLC, Amazon.c om, Inc., Apple Inc., Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Huawei Device USA, Inc., HTC Cor p., HTC America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., an d Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Defendants”). Plaintiff ContentGuard Holdings, Inc.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case